Occupy Sydney Headline Animator

Thursday, 29 January 2015

Reasons to #PutLNPlast in Qld NSW and Australia

post=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rebelmouse.com%2Fres%2F4846389%2F952264654&credentials=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rebelmouse.com%2FBoycottNewmanLNPSupporters%2Fqldvote_%2F" class="rebelmouse-embedded-post" id="rebelmouse-embedded-post">

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Occupy Sydney Light Brigades forming (and #StopTPPAustralia toolkit )

Picture from MSF 
Live News    

Occupy Sydney Light Brigades are forming with an initial focus on the Stopping the Trans Pacific Partnership coming through the front door or the back door.

  The video above shows you the big picture about how bad the TPP will be for you. But there's much more. Government's and Corporations don't have a preference as to whether they bring it in through the front or back door...and they're trying to do it in secret. The front door is by signing the agreement. The backdoor is by bringing it in in piecemeal scraps of legislation scattered across Federal State and local body jurisdictions. Some of which will bang the door shut on our freedoms. 

Mandatory Data Retention will bring the TPP clause sought by Hollywood copyright holders through the back door if we let it. Under Mandatory Data Retention you will pay for your internet service provider to store your metadata for 2 years in case the government want to use it. There is nothing preventing government selling that invaluable metadata to any commercial interest should they choose to do so.
 Mandatory Data Retention is one of several laws which are on the table or already enacted which will put the TPP in place via the back door.

TPP to live on in other acronyms even if it fails: 

In 2015 we have the responsibility to stand up and fight back. It is the most important battle facing Australian people as well as those of other potential partner countries in a generation. It is a battle in defence of freedom. Choose your method here.
Further information:

Why control one side of the conversation when you can control it all?

The name Rothschild is synonymous with everything that revered Corporate Capital and their political servants -and reviled by people who see that a better world is possible...

Message to Ricky Muir on Uni Fees

We hear you're wavering, that's not OK
We thought your integrity war was won
you took a stand for the people, don't turn and run
Don't you dare have a change of heart

Ricky don't lose your Thunder
You don't want to lose the peoples trust
Send it off in a letter to yourself
Ricky don't lose your thunder
It's the only one you own
You might use it if you feel better
When you get home

You are the peoples friend so far, they know your name
Your Driving passion got you in politics Fast Lane
Education definitely is not your game, we know
The people too could have a change of Heart


You know you're not Tony Abbott's kind
and we believe you know your mind
And if have a change of heart then

Ricky don't lose your Thunder
You don't want to lose the peoples trust
tell Abbott to go screw himself
Ricky don't lose your thunder
or those who elected you will disown
integrity will make you better
When you get home

Occupy Sydney's new 2015 discussion hub is here

For 2015 Occupy Sydney are holding our discussions away from Facebook. Our Facebook channels will still be maintained. 

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

Japanese Whale poachers should be very afraid

Anti-whaling activism out of Australia just got a whole lot smarter, faster and flashier. Not to
mention scarier. Chris Graham reports.
Sea Shepherd – the globally renowned environmental organisation with its southern base in Australia – has just upped the ante in the fight to prevent illegal whaling with an announcement yesterday that construction will begin immediately on a state-of-the-art vessel aimed squarely at frustrating Japan’s ongoing attempts to strip our ocean of whales
(from New Matilda below)

Leard Blockade: Golden Guitarist Luke O'Shea locks on

Golden Guitarist Luke O'Shea is the latest defender arrested after locking on against the destructive expansion of the Whitehaven and Idemitsu-Boggabri Coal Mines which will destroy much of the unique Leard Forest habitat.
"Let us all remember our forefathers defining ANZAC spirit & courage as they answered the call to join & help their mates already over the other side of the world fighting for their lives.
One hundred years on, the call for help and for backup is coming now from our own mates and family members, whose lives & livelihoods are being attacked in our own back yard, on our own Australian soil.
The enemy has not used bayonets or bullets to invade, but bureaucracy and bullshit. Too much of our country is covered in mining licences." - Luke O'Shea
Join Luke in the fight and come out to the ‪#‎LeardBlockade‬ for Bat Attack

Monday, 26 January 2015

Invasion/Survival Day Rallies Across Australia

We were sure that Lamestream media would cover it but they're all about recognise aren't they? Here's what the blackfellas and community who aren't subservient to government money are saying:

Sunday, 25 January 2015

#Anonymous: The Truth about Australia Day

IND MP MP Peter Wellington calls for Newman electoral voter blackmail investigation

 Peter Wellington: (posted on facebook) I am writing to the Queensland Electoral

Commission to investigate Newman’s threats to voters On Tuesday I will send a formal letter to the Electoral Commission asking them to investigate threats made by Premier Newman and his candidates to vote for the LNP or miss out on promised infrastructure and services. These outrageous bribes or threats to voters could breach the Queensland Electoral Act and attract a term of imprisonment. Recently we have seen the Premier and his candidates warn electors that only if they elect them will they receive any promised advantages to their electorate. In other words, vote for me or get nothing. Tomorrow is Australia Day and the behaviour of this Newman LNP Government falls far short of that which we expect from our leaders. No longer in Queensland is everyone equal before the law, and no longer does the LNP govern for all Queenslanders only those who vote for them. Please share.

Campbell Newman says he cannot guarantee the Liberal National Party's big spending promises, even those with bipartisan support, if the party wins government but not the seat a project is in. (read more ABC )

Occupy Sydney urge you (if you are a registered Queensland voter) to support and endorse Peter Wellington's call by writing to the Electoral Commission yourself demanding that they investigate the legality of Newmans crude blackmail attack.A call for cancellation of the election could be added. Please add your voter ID. 
Electoral Commission Queensland

Electoral enquiries: 1300 881 665 
9:00am - 6:00pm Monday to Friday,
9:00am - 5:00pm SaturdayFax: (07) 3229 7391Email address: ecq@ecq.qld.gov.au 


Saturday, 24 January 2015

Sunfresh: The kind of businesses that support Newman,Newman supports (and business as usual)

It comes as no surprise that the Sunfresh Laundry business in Darra which Campbell Newman recently used as a platform for his election campaign is mired in the grubbiness of worker exploitation. Still its shocking to learn from concerned and bureaucratically hamstrung professionaly who spoke us only on the condition of anonimity of two serious lost time injuries at the workplace within minutes of Newmans arrival.
 According to Newman "Sunfresh Linen is a great example of a business that will save under the LNP’s strong plan with savings of about $78,000 on their water bills over two years from 2016/17 and ongoing savings of about $16,000 a year on their electricity bills."
   No mention of the plant paying workers below minimum award wages until recently-or the lost time injuries to workers. No mention of the company refusing to negotiate a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement. No mention of the lack of workplace compliance standards the workers have to endure. 
 This is the type of exploitative businesses which Campbell Newman and the Queensland Liberal National Party are quite happy to endorse.  
 The plant, a family business is operated by brothers Steven Daniel and Lawrence George who were unavailable when we tried to contact them. 
(More coming on this story) 

The Secret Silk Road Journals and Australian link

Australian - British Citizen Peter Nash was extradited to the U.S. on Silk Road charges. There is some mirth in his allegedly doing his "job" from inside the confines of Wacol Prison where he worked. If found guilty Peter faces life in prison.
  A side revelation is that while Australia will quite happily allow and facilitate extradition of its citizens to the U.S. the U.S. will not extradite its citizens to Australia. The U.K. conservative MP Theresa May pushed laws through the British parliament which recognised such an imbalance in their extradition treaty and to the benefit of Gary MacKinnon and others awaiting extradition passed laws refusing to extradite to the U.S. We wait in Australia for extradition parity to be back on the table.
 The journals of alleged Silk Road mastermind Ross Ulbricht provide an insight into how he built Silk Road. They are on the link below

Friday, 23 January 2015

Sadies - The Movie #NoCSG #NoMining

Barrett Brown: 5 years 3 months jail for a Tweet

 "When injustice becomes law resistance becomes duty." 
 Following the recent sentencing of Jeremy Hammond to ten years jail for giving the public information on the US government's nefarious STRATFOR operations the terrorism of would be "whistleblowers" - people who come from the school of ethics that demands they act in the publics interest- today the injustice continued...

  Today's Supreme Court message was directed at and calculated to cause fear among those activists of the decentralised Anonymous collective-and others who may choose to take that path.In a calculated act of State Terrorism Barrett Brown was sentenced to 5 years and 3 months jail for reposting information on Stratfor which the government of the United States didn't want the world to know about. 
Full statement to the Court from Barrett Brown (reposted from Sparrow Media)
[DALLAS, TX]  A sentencing hearing is underway in a Dallas Federal Court this morning to determine if journalist Barrett Brown will be released on a sentence of time served or if he will remain in prison for several more years.  Brown’s attorneys are asking that the journalist, who has already served over two years in Federal Detention, be granted a sentence of time served.  Prosecutors are asking for a sentence of 8.5 years be imposed on Brown, and cite his proximity to sources in the clandestine hacker collective Anonymous as reason for the upward departure.
Barrett Brown
As part of the hearing Barrett Brown will be provided an opportunity to address the court before a sentence is handed down.  The following is Brown’s statement in it’s entirety as prepared by Brown and read into court record today:
Good afternoon, Your Honor.
“The allocution I give today is going to be a bit different from the sort that usually concludes a sentencing hearing, because this is an unusual case touching upon unusual issues. It is also a very public case, not only in the sense that it has been followed closely by the public, but also in the sense that it has implications for the public, and even in the sense that the public has played a major role, because, of course, the great majority of the funds for my legal defense was donated by the public. And so now I have three duties that I must carry out. I must express my regret, but I must also express my gratitude. And I also have to take this opportunity to ensure that the public understands what has been at stake in this case, and why it has proceeded in the way that it has. Because, of course, the public didn’t simply pay for my defense through its donations, they also paid for my prosecution through its tax dollars. And the public has a right to know what it is paying for. And Your Honor has a need to know what he is ruling on.
“First I will speak of regret. Like nearly all federal defendants, I hope to convince Your Honor that I sincerely regret some of the things that I have done. I don’t think anyone doubts that I regret quite a bit about my life including some of the things that brought me here today. Your Honor has the Acceptance of Responsibility document that my counsel submitted to you. Every word of it was sincere. The videos were idiotic, and although I made them in a manic state brought on by sudden withdrawal from Paxil and Suboxone, and while distraught over the threats to prosecute my mother, that’s still me in those YouTube clips talking nonsense about how the FBI would never take me alive. Likewise, I didn’t have the right to hide my files from the FBI during a lawful investigation, and I would’ve had a better chance of protecting my contacts in foreign countries if I had pursued the matter in the courts after the raid, rather than stupidly trying to hide those laptops in the kitchen cabinet as my mother and I did that morning. And with regard to the accessory after the fact charge relating to my efforts to redact sensitive emails after the Stratfor hack, I’ve explained to Your Honor that I do not want to be a hypocrite. If I criticize the government for breaking the law but then break the law myself in an effort to reveal their wrongdoing, I should expect to be punished just as I’ve called for the criminals at government-linked firms like HBGary and Palantir to be punished. When we start fighting crime by any means necessary we become guilty of the same hypocrisy as law enforcement agencies throughout history that break the rules to get the villains, and so become villains themselves.
“I’m going to say a few more words about my regrets in a moment, but now I’m going to get to the unusual part of the allocution. I’m going to make some criticisms of the manner in which the government has pursued this case. Normally this sort of thing is left to one’s lawyers rather than the defendant, because to do otherwise runs the risk of making the defendant seem combative rather than contrite. But I think Your Honor can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time. I think Your Honor understands that one can regret the unjust things one has done, while also being concerned about the unjust things that have been done to him. And based on certain statements that Your Honor has made, as well as one particular ruling, I have cause to believe that Your Honor will understand and perhaps even sympathize with the unusual responsibility I have which makes it necessary that I point out some things very briefly.
“I do so with respect to Your Honor. I also do it for selfish reasons, because I want to make absolutely certain that Your Honor is made aware that the picture the government has presented to you is a false one. But it is also my duty to make this clear as this case does not just affect me. Even aside from the several First Amendment issues that have already been widely discussed as a result of this case, there is also the matter of the dozens of people around the world who have contributed to my distributed think tank, Project PM, by writing for our public website, echelon2.org. Incredibly, the government has declared these contributors — some of them journalists — to be criminals, and participants in a criminal conspiracy. As such, the government sought from this court a subpoena by which to obtain the identities of all of our contributors. Your Honor denied that motion and I am very grateful to Your Honor for having done so. Unfortunately the government thereafter went around Your Honor and sought to obtain these records by other means. So now the dozens of people who have given their time and expertise to what has been hailed by journalists and advocacy groups as a crucial journalistic enterprise are now at risk of being indicted under the same sort of spurious charges that I was facing not long ago, when the government exposed me to decades of prison time for copying and pasting a link to a publicly available file that other journalists were also linking to without being prosecuted. The fact that the government has still asked you to punish me for that link is proof, if any more were needed, that those of us who advocate against secrecy are to be pursued without regard for the rule of law, or even common decency.
“Your Honor, I understand that this is my sentencing hearing and not an inquiry into the government’s conduct. This is not the place to go into the dozens of demonstrable errors and contradictions to be found in the government’s documentation, and the testimony by the government. But it would be hypocritical of me to protest the government’s conduct and not provide Your Honor with an example. I will do so very briefly. At the September 13th bond hearing, held in Magistrate Judge Stickney’s court the day after my arrest, Special Agent Allyn Lynd took the stand and claimed under oath that in reviewing my laptops he had found discussions in which I admit having engaged in, quote, “SWATting”, unquote, which he referred to as, quote, “violent activity”, unquote. Your Honor may not be familiar with the term SWATting; as Mr. Lynd described it at the hearing it is, quote, “where they try to place a false 911 call to the residence of an individual in order to endanger that individual.” He went on at elaborate length about this, presenting it as a key reason why I should not receive bond. Your Honor will have noted that this has never come up again. This is because Mr. Lynd’s claims were entirely untrue. But that did not stop him from making that claim, any more than it stopped him from claiming that I have lived in the Middle East, a region I have never actually had the pleasure of visiting.
“Your Honor, this is just one example from a single hearing. But if Your Honor can extrapolate from that, Your Honor can probably get a sense of how much value can be placed on the rest of the government’s testimony in this case. Likewise, Your Honor can probably understand the concerns I have about what my contributors might be subjected to by the government if this sort of behavior proves effective today. Naturally I hope Your Honor will keep this in mind, and I hope that other judges in this district will as well, because, again, there remains great concern that my associates will be the next to be indicted.
“I’ve tried to protect my contributors, Your Honor, and I’ve also tried to protect the public’s right to link to source materials without being subject to misuse of the statutes. Last year, when the government offered me a plea bargain whereby I would plead to just one of the eleven fraud charges related to the linking, and told me it was final, I turned it down. To have accepted that plea, with a two-year sentence, would have been convenient. Your Honor will note that I actually did eventually plea to an accessory charge carrying potentially more prison time — but it would have been wrong. Even aside from the obvious fact that I did not commit fraud, and thus couldn’t sign on to any such thing, to do so would have also constituted a dangerous precedent, and it would have endangered my colleagues each of whom could now have been depicted as a former associate of a convicted fraudster. And it would have given the government, and particularly the FBI, one more tool by which to persecute journalists and activists whose views they find to be dangerous or undesirable.
“Journalists are especially vulnerable right now, Your Honor, and they become more so when the FBI feels comfortable making false claims about them. And in response to our motion to dismiss the charges of obstruction of justice based on the hiding of my laptops, the government claimed that those laptops contained evidence of a plot I orchestrated to attack the Kingdom of Bahrain on the orders of Amber Lyon. Your Honor, Amber Lyon is a journalist and former CNN reporter, who I do know and respect, but I can assure Your Honor that I am not in the habit of attacking Gulf state monarchies on her behalf. But I think it’s unjust of them to use this court to throw out that sort of claim about Miss Lyon in a public filing as they did if they’re not prepared to back it up. And they’re not prepared to back it up. But that won’t stop the Kingdom of Bahrain from repeating this groundless assertion and perhaps even using it to keep Miss Lyon out of the country — because she has indeed reported on the Bahraini monarchy’s violent crackdowns on pro-democracy protests in that country, and she has done so from that country. And if she ever returns to that country to continue that important work, she’ll now be subject to arrest on the grounds that the United States Department of Justice itself has explicitly accused her of orchestrating an attack on that country’s government.
“Your Honor, this is extraordinary. Miss Lyon isn’t the only journalist that’s been made less secure legally by this prosecution. Every journalist in the United States is put at risk by the novel, and sometimes even radical, claims that the government has introduced in the course of the sentencing process. The government asserts that I am not a journalist and thus unable to claim the First Amendment protections guaranteed to those engaged in information-gathering activities. Your Honor, I’ve been employed as a journalist for much of my adult life, I’ve written for dozens of magazines and newspapers, and I’m the author of two published and critically-acclaimed books of expository non-fiction. Your Honor has received letters from editors who have published my journalistic work, as well as from award-winning journalists such as Glenn Greenwald, who note that they have used that work in their own articles. If I am not a journalist, then there are many, many people out there who are also not journalists, without being aware of it, and who are thus as much at risk as I am.
“Your Honor, it would be one thing if the government were putting forth some sort of standard by which journalists could be defined. They have not put forth such a standard. Their assertion rests on the fact that despite having referred to myself as a journalist hundreds of times, I at one point rejected that term, much in the same way that someone running for office might reject the term “politician”. Now, if the government is introducing a new standard whereby anyone who once denies being a particular thing is no longer that thing in any legal sense, then that would be at least a firm and knowable criteria. But that’s not what the government is doing in this case. Consider, for instance, that I have denied being a spokesperson for Anonymous hundreds of times, both in public and private, ever since the press began calling me that in the beginning of 2011. So on a couple of occasions when I contacted executives of contracting firms like Booz Allen Hamilton in the wake of revelations that they’d been spying on my associates and me for reasons that we were naturally rather anxious to determine, I did indeed pretend to be such an actual official spokesman for Anonymous, because I wanted to encourage these people to talk to me. Which they did.
“Of course, I have explained this many, many times, and the government itself knows this, even if they’ve since claimed otherwise. In the September 13th criminal complaint filed against me, the FBI itself acknowledges that I do not claim any official role within Anonymous. Likewise, in last month’s hearing, the prosecutor accidentally slipped and referred to me as a journalist, even after having previously found it necessary to deny me that title. But, there you have it. Deny being a spokesperson for Anonymous hundreds of times, and you’re still a spokesperson for Anonymous. Deny being a journalist once or twice, and you’re not a journalist. What conclusion can one draw from this sort of reasoning other than that you are whatever the FBI finds it convenient for you to be at any given moment. This is not the “rule of law”, Your Honor, it is the “rule of law enforcement”, and it is very dangerous.
“Your Honor, I am asking you to give me a time-served sentence of thirty months today because to do otherwise will have the effect of rewarding this sort of reckless conduct on the part of the government. I am also asking for that particular sentence because, as my lawyer Marlo Cadeddu, an acknowledged expert on the guidelines, has pointed out, that’s what the actual facts of the case would seem to warrant. And the public, to the extent that it has made its voice heard through letters and donations and even op-eds in major newspapers, also believes that the circumstances of this case warrant that I be released today. I would even argue that the government itself believes that the facts warrant my release today, because look at all the lies they decided they would have to tell to keep me in prison.
“I thank you for your indulgence, Your Honor, and I want to conclude by thanking everyone who supported me over the last few years. I need to single out one person in particular, Kevin Gallagher, who contributed to my Project PM group, and who stepped up immediately after my arrest to build up a citizens’ initiative by which to raise money for my defense, and to spread the word about what was at stake in this case. For the two and a half years of my incarceration, Kevin has literally spent the bulk of his free time in working to give me my life back. He is one of the extraordinary people who have given of themselves to make possible this great and beautiful movement of ours, this movement to protect activists and journalists from secretive and extra-legal retaliation by powerful corporate actors with ties to the state. Your Honor, Kevin Gallagher is not a relative of mine, or a childhood friend. This is only the third time I’ve been in the same room with him. Nonetheless, he has dedicated two years of his life to ensure that I had the best possible lawyers on this case, and to ensure that the press understood what was at stake here. Your Honor, he set up something on Amazon.com whereby I could ask for books on a particular subject and supporters could buy them and have them sent to me. And he spoke to my mother several times a week. During that early period when I was facing over a hundred years worth of charges, and it wasn’t clear whether or not I would be coming home, he would offer support and reassurance to her, an effort that I will never be able to repay. He knows how much I regret the pain and heartbreak that my family has suffered throughout this ordeal.
“A few weeks ago, Kevin got a job at the Freedom of The Press Foundation, one of the world’s most justifiably respected advocacy organizations. And, according to the government, he is also a member of a criminal organization, because, like dozens of journalists and activists across the world, he has been a contributor to Project PM, and the government has declared Project PM to be a criminal enterprise. I think that the government is wrong about Kevin, Your Honor, but that is not why I’ve brought him up. And although I am very glad for the opportunity to express my gratitude to him in a public setting, there are some gifts for which conventional gratitude is an insufficient payment. One can only respond to such gifts by working to become the sort of person that actually deserves to receive them. A thank-you will not suffice, and so I am not bringing him up here merely to thank him. Instead, I am using him in my defense. Your Honor, this very noble person, this truly exemplary citizen of the republic who takes his citizenship seriously rather than taking it for granted, knows pretty much everything there is to know about me — my life, my past, my work, from the things I’ve done and the things I’ve left undone, to the things I should not have done to begin with — and he has given himself over to the cause of freeing me today. He is the exact sort of person I tried to recruit for the crucial work we do at Project PM. I am so proud to have someone like him doing so much for me.
“Your Honor, the last thing I will say in my own defense is that so many people like Kevin Gallagher have worked so hard on my behalf. And having now said all those things that I felt the need to say, I respectfully accept Your Honor’s decision in my sentencing.
“Thank you."

Inside the hacking of Stratfor: the FBI’s case against Antisec member Anarchaos